Skip to content
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Bluesky
  • Discord
  • X
  • Instagram
  • RSS
Essex Ham Logo

Essex Ham

Supporting Amateur Radio in Essex

  • Home
  • Get Started
    • What is Amateur Radio?
    • Become a Ham
    • Amateur Radio Explained
    • Guide for Parents
    • Amateur Radio Books
    • Common Questions
  • Advice
    • How to Become a Ham
    • Passed? Get Your Licence
    • Just Got Your Licence?
    • Your First Handheld
    • Your First Station
    • Getting Started Guides
    • Returning to the Hobby
    • Getting Started with Data
    • Downloads & Handouts
    • Your Questions (FAQ)
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
      • Calendar View
      • Poster View
      • Upcoming Field Events
      • Upcoming Training
      • Essex Field Events This Year
      • Upcoming Local Rallies
    • Next Essex Ham Events
    • Club Events List
    • Recent Events in Essex
    • Essex 2m Activity Days
    • Annual Event List
    • Latest News & Articles
  • Training
    • How to Get Started
    • Foundation Online Course
    • Training Courses in Essex
    • Other Online Courses
    • Training Videos
    • Training Material
    • Training Information
    • Essex Training Calendar
    • For Tutors
  • Clubs
    • Support for Clubs
    • Clubs in Essex
    • Resources & Downloads
    • Training Material
    • Promotional Videos
    • Essex Speakers Directory
  • Members
    • Join our Community
      • Join Essex Ham (free)
      • Essex Ham Members FAQ
    • Forum
    • Live Chatroom
    • Merchandise
    • Recommended Kit
    • Members-Only
      • Members-Only Area
      • Member Main Page
      • Your Member Profile
      • Email Alerts
      • Essex Ham Newsletter
      • Email Discussion Group
  • About Us
    • What is Essex Ham?
    • Latest News & Articles
    • Forum
    • Videos
    • Internet Radio Stream
    • Podcast
    • Live Weather
    • Essex Ham APRS iGate
    • Essex Ham Meshtastic
    • Essex Ham Newsletter
    • Essex Activity Map
    • About Our Site
  • Net
    • Monday Night Net Info
    • Monday Net Chatroom
    • Monday Net Reports
    • Young Ladies Net
    • Live Audio Feed
    • Danbury Repeater GB3DA
    • Other Nets in Essex
    • Repeaters in Essex
  • Contact/Chat
    • Forum
    • Email Discussion Group
    • Need some help?
    • Contact The Team
    • Our Facebook Group
    • Discussion Group List

Syllabus Survey 2017: Why RSGB should make Foundation harder

Posted on 29 June 20176 February 2020 By Pete M0PSX No Comments on Syllabus Survey 2017: Why RSGB should make Foundation harder

In June 2017, RSGB launched a consultation into its proposed changes to the Foundation syllabus.

We’ve been running our own survey, to gauge opinions from the amateur radio community.

At the time of writing, 63 amateurs (36% of respondents) feel that RSGB should make Foundation exams harder. Why is this?

Survey results and feedback to our Syllabus Review summary clearly show a desire to keep the barrier-to-entry as it is, but it’s interesting to look at the reasons why so many existing amateurs want to see Foundation made more difficult:

Syllabus Survey: Should Foundation be easier or harder?
Syllabus Survey: Should Foundation be easier or harder?

My take?

At a time where we’re struggling to get more people into the hobby, doing anything to make it more difficult for people to get involved in the hobby seems counter-productive. So why does a reasonable percentage want to make that barrier to entry harder? Let’s look at the reasons given in the survey…

Survey Comments for “Make Foundation Harder”

The changes in the revised syllabus are welcome.
Regarding construction, the inference on the Essex Ham page is that construction is not permitted for Foundation which is not the case.
Kit constructed transmitters are already permitted but there seems to be uncertainty among some Full licensees about the regulations which in itself discourages Foundation holders from trying. Ideally Foundation should be permitted to construct transmitters using parts sourced individually as well as kits.
434 MHz transmitting payloads for High Altitude Balloons providing coverage of the British Isles operating in 434 MHz  have built and operated by untrained, unqualified and unlicenced children (age 15) – there have been no problems!
Trained, Qualified and Licenced Foundation holders should have far greater privileges than that. The changes proposed in Section 2 Technical Aspects may facilitate the removal from the licence of the unnecessary restriction on “non-kit” construction.
Its about time this happened, the dumbing down of exams, has been at the deterement of opperating standards and practices.
The step between foundation and intermediate has always been too large. The same can be said for the step from intermediate to full. I see the next step is to move things from full to intermediate.
no more block diagrams, more Q codes are good
I have seen a downwards spiral in technical ability so anything to increase newcomers ability is a good thing.
Not sure of the need to introduce the additional electronic elements are required but additional training around operation (esp SDR and DV)  and safety can’t do any harm.
There has been too much attention given to getting people in quickly over the last few years. Having a harder foundation will make for longer courses, better bonding between students and the hobby and a strong sense of achievement for those that pass.
I think it’s because the jump from foundation to intermediate is a big one.   Ask any of the members and local FL operators about to take the intermediate, and I reckon they’ll agree.

You can’t make the intermediate easier, as then you have a massive step up again to the advanced, and at that level, it would be more harmful still.

Basically, as I see it, they’re correcting a problem at the best level to tackle it.

The foundation was too easy, and lacked many syllabus areas that the FL holder actually needed. 

SSB in block diagrams was missing.. 

there was nothing on ionospheric layers….

Nothing on EMC mobile…. 

important Q code coverage was missing… 

a lot of material safety advice is now present… 

Morse only was an anomaly, and it’s good to see data modes and SDR usage added.

Make it harder to pass FL – also those people who have held a FL or IM licence for more than 5 years without progression must re test every 5 years or lose licence.
Charge everyone a fee for the licence.
Quite surprised listening to many Novice licensed Amateurs, Basic Fundamentals seem to be devoid from the syllabus.
More needs to be included to give the necessary basic technical ability to operate and set up and operate.
also believe there should be varied access to bands but not everything. Access should be in stages increasing as you work up to full license .
repeater and net practicals needed
Still much too easy!
whilst the Foundation exam course requires some changes the proposed ones are over the top. I have frequently tried to bring to  attention of the RSGB the need
for the use of repeaters and the operating procedures that should be used when on air.Also that we require some means of instilling good manners as part of the course.
resistors in series and parallel is not a bad idea but why not just keep it to series then it could be incorporated into a revised DC circuit.
adding SDR radio to a foundation course is a retrograde step who as a Foundation holder is about to purchase a SDR unit and as a tutor for a small club I am not in a
position to purchase a SDR radio for my students to set up and run data on.
The addition of polar diagrams not a bad idea but who is to provide them as with a lot of these new proposals it is going to fall on the clubs and tutors to provide the
material that means that we will not get a consistent course from club to club the very foundation on which these courses were designed in the first place.
But if the RSGB is to provide the new resources to enable us to implement the changes I look forward to receiving my free Icom ic7300and lot of books on antenna theory
that I will require For each student.
One last point the New Foundation now book that will be required for the new syllabus looks to be an exercise to compile and will at the speed that the RSGB works would certainly not be ready for 2017
The hobby will survive only if it gains the respect it once had. Making the content of the Foundation more in keeping with material that is actually needed to start to use radios is to be applauded. Items that are foundational to construction etc., give a preview of the higher stages and an encouragement to strive towards progression. Currently in my experience we have a large contingent who are satisfied with 10W and so do not progress and yet do not really understand those things they need to do to stay legal and not cause interference and distress to others.
I hear many conversations between foundations licensees that convince me that the level is no where near enough.A recent one that made me cringe was a guy who couldn’t understand that when he moved his vhf aerial and it was lower than previously his signals were much stronger.Later in the conversation it transpired that it had been moved from the loft to an outdoor location!!! This is only one of many and as for stating that certain knowledge is not needed with only 10watts of power I know of only 2 in my area that abide by that.The big majority will admit,in private.that they use the output  power of the radio in use and I genuinely know of 2 with 1kw linears.All wrong but do Ofcom or anybody else have the bodies or finance to police it? Rant over and soapbox away!!!
I welcome any changes that make the FL licence more of an acheivement for people than it is today. In my view it is far to easy.
i agree with adding the extra intermediate parts to the exam as its far to easy and it gives them a better idea of amateur radio and what it is about
Foundation level is too easy hence the high pass rate.
The current Foundation syllabus does not adequately prepare new amateurs for general operation on the bands. My own club and most of the others I know of already go further than the syllabus at Foundation level. Since starting delivering training and coaching at all three levels, we have only had one person fail at Foundation giving us a pass rate of 95% plus. The proposed changes will no doubt change this, but people who put in a bit of work on the theory before the exam should not find it too much of a change. Where the changes will be seen in the pass rates will be in the two day “Foundation Factories” where there might not be enough time for some people to take in the additional concepts before the exam.
When I took my Foundation Exam, I thought it was relatively easy and I can understand why is should be made a little more difficult, with definitely more electronic and antenna theory. I’ve spoken to quite a few M6 and they often appear to be quite clueless with regards to electronics and basic ‘radio’ theory. I think this is a good move.
Yes, it’s been too easy for far too long.
The added technical side is a good thing, but mandatory digital mode testing is just makes me think Icom have slipped RSGB a few quid here and there. What next? Mandatory DSTAR(TM) purchase receipts?
Pointless exercise.  Foundation was too easy and intermediate level was actually no harder. The biggest leap was intermediate to full. They should move half the full syllabus to intermediate instead.
The current foundation level is way to low. I think it should only be allowed for children under 14 to take the current foundation level. 15 and above should take the intermediate minimum.

Procedures, protocols and practices has been lacking in the foundation ever since it’s inception and I welcome more, lots more training in that department along with more of everything else.

Don’t know what happened in the “olden days” but IT IS a technical/scientific hobby so we should be prepared to get stuck into that, That means you have to know maths and science basics (from school) before you start. It should be a bit hard otherwise, why bother. Look forward to going straight on with the intermediate. They should be part of the same course/exam.
Common sense,technical knowledge ,operating and knowing licence conditions are a must, but power levels should be foundation  35W
Intermediate 100w ,full licence 1KW ..
Radios bought or sold should have pink slips,and be registered..like a car, so you know who has what from where.
Stop this baofeng crew from getting unlicensed kit.
The Morse practical is simple and inexpensive to do and after all Morse is worth learning for lots of reasons. Making the syllabus longer means that the Foundation course and prep will be longer.
On the other hand the three tier exam should be reduced to two over the longer term  Or perhaps the nature of the exams themselves changed to have a modular content.
Doing exams online might well help too.
Foundation Syllabus at the moment is far to easy (in my opinion) and I would welcome the changes proposed   De G0xxx  Roy
Digital is just a mode of operation I think a good grounding in anilog would give foundation holders enough to start operating. They should then be able to gain knoweledge of digital through other means.  Better to concentrate more on electrical, operation, safety and licence conditions. More detailed knoweledge of digital should start at intermeadiate or even advanced. There are many resent that have recently taken their intermediate & advanced that ask questions on forums that they really ought to know so have failed to gain a true understanding in some cases of relatively simple concepts. I took my foundation in 2013, intermediate in 2014 & advanced 2016. I found the content throughout about right but would have liked a more in depth approach to some of the sections. I feel you only start to really learn once on air.

 

The consensus from 36% of our poll seems to be a feeling amongst that minority that standards have slipped since Foundation was introduced way back in 2003. Could it be that these comments are coming from licencees who had to spend months at local colleges studying to get a licence and would like to see a return to the days when it took six months of theory to get a licence? Back then of course, the exam was all theory (no practical content at all), and you could get a licence without touching a radio (unlike today where demonstrating compentance is mandatory)

Of course, getting a Full licence is harder today than back in the City & Guilds RAE days. Take a look at Getting a Full Licence – Then and Now

So, which direction will the RSGB take in respect of syllabus changes… watch this space…

Pete M0PSX

 

Related Links

  • RSGB Syllabus Review
  • Current Foundation syllabus
  • Essex Ham’s Material for Tutors
  • Essex Ham’s Foundation Online course
Articles Tags:foundation, RSGB, Survey, Syllabus Review

Post navigation

Previous Post: Monday Night Net 26 June 2017
Next Post: Essex Ham YL Net 01 July 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Member Login (Join Essex Ham!)
Remember me




Need help logging in?

Essex Ham Newslettter:

Looking for general updates on amateur radio? Join our free newsletter:

Recent Essex Ham Posts

  • St George’s Day 2025 Activation
  • RSGB AGM – Saturday 11 April 2025
  • Getting a Licence – We need to do better!
  • Ofcom Licence Exemptions Consultation 2025
Callsign:

Upcoming Local Events

  • Monday Night Net on 26 May 2025 20:00
  • CARS: Monthly Club Night Placeholder on 3 June 2025 19:30
  • SEARS: Monthly Club Night Placeholder on 12 June 2025 19:30
  • Ipswich ESWR Rally 2025 on 15 June 2025 09:30
Essex Ham recommends:

Realtek USB SDR

  • Getting started? Baofeng UV-5R 2m/70cm handheld: £30
  • Listen to the bands on your computer: USB Software Defined Radio Dongle: £10 (More)
  • Meshtastic Networking: Meshtasic Heltec V3 (More)

Heltec Meshtashic
More Recommendations

Recent Forum Discussion

Peter M0PWX (2E0PWX) replied to VHF yagi balun 3 days ago Yagi's don't normally need impedance matching baluns, but a 1:1 balun isola...
DarrenSmith78 started VHF yagi balun 4 days ago Hello all. I have a VHF yagi that was gifted to me. The box containing the ...
Peter M0PWX (2E0PWX) replied to Baofeng GT3TP 1 week ago i forgot the file, the CSV you can import into chirp is in the zip file att...

Recent Comments

  • Gary Hayes on RSGB AGM – Saturday 11 April 2025
  • M5AKA on Ofcom Licence Exemptions Consultation 2025
  • M5AKA on Ofcom Licence Exemptions Consultation 2025

Show Your Support for Essex Ham

Free Training. Free Content. Free Help. No Membership Fees. Want to say thanks? PayPal or Coffee donations are always appreciated.
Make a donation

Copyright © 2011-2025 Essex Ham. Home | About This Site | Site Terms & Privacy | GDPR Statement >>

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalised ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to our use of cookies, however you can select "Cookie Settings" to control your consent. View Terms & Privacy Policy
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
apbct_cookies_testsessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to prevent spam on comments and forms and act as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for the site.
apbct_headlesssessionCleantalk set this cookie to detect spam and improve the website's security.
apbct_page_hitssessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to prevent spam on comments and forms and act as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for the site.
apbct_prev_referersessionFunctional cookie placed by CleanTalk Spam Protect to store referring IDs and prevent unauthorized spam from being sent from the website.
apbct_site_landing_tssessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to prevent spam on comments and forms and act as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for the site.
apbct_site_referer3 daysThis cookie is placed by CleanTalk Spam Protect to prevent spam and to store the referrer page address which led the user to the website.
apbct_timestampsessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to prevent spam on comments and forms and act as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for the site.
apbct_urls3 daysThis cookie is placed by CleanTalk Spam Protect to prevent spam and to store the addresses (urls) visited on the website.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
CookieLawInfoConsent1 yearRecords the default button state of the corresponding category & the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie.
ct_checkjssessionCleanTalk–Used to prevent spam on our comments and forms and acts as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for this site.
ct_fkp_timestampsessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to prevent spam on the site's comments/forms, and to act as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for the site.
ct_has_scrolledsessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to store dynamic variables from the browser.
ct_pointer_datasessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to prevent spam on the site's comments/forms, and to act as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for the site.
ct_ps_timestampsessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to prevent spam on the site's comments/forms, and to act as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for the site.
ct_sfw_pass_key1 monthCleanTalk sets this cookie to prevent spam on comments and forms and act as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for the site.
ct_timezonesessionCleanTalk–Used to prevent spam on our comments and forms and acts as a complete anti-spam solution and firewall for this site.
sessionIdsessionThis cookie, set by Microsoft, is used by the website to store the user's session ID and is sent with each request to the ASP.NET application.
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
CookieDurationDescription
apbct_pixel_urlsessionCleanTalk set this cookie to provide spam protection.
__cf_bm30 minutesThis cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
CookieDurationDescription
_gat1 minuteThis cookie is installed by Google Universal Analytics to restrain request rate and thus limit the collection of data on high traffic sites. For details of this cookie, go to Google's Privacy & Terms site
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
CONSENT2 yearsYouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
ct_screen_infosessionCleanTalk sets this cookie to complete an anti-spam solution and firewall for the website, preventing spam from appearing in comments and forms.
UID1 year 1 month 4 daysScorecard Research sets this cookie for browser behaviour research.
_ga1 year 1 month 4 daysThe _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors. For details of this cookie, go to Google's Privacy & Terms site
_gat_gtag_UA_*1 minuteSet by Google to distinguish users. For details of this cookie, go to Google's Privacy & Terms site
_gid1 dayInstalled by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously. For details of this cookie, go to Google's Privacy & Terms site
__gads1 year 24 daysThe __gads cookie, set by Google, is stored under DoubleClick domain and tracks the number of times users see an advert, measures the success of the campaign and calculates its revenue. This cookie can only be read from the domain they are set on and will not track any data while browsing through other sites. For details of this cookie, go to Google's Privacy & Terms site
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
DSID1 hourThis cookie is set by DoubleClick to note the user's specific user identity. It contains a hashed/encrypted unique ID.
ebaysessionThe domain of this cookie is owned by Ebay. This cookie is used for targeting and advertising purpose.
IDE1 year 24 daysGoogle DoubleClick IDE cookies are used to store information about how the user uses the website to present them with relevant ads and according to the user profile.
mc1 year 1 monthQuantserve sets the mc cookie to anonymously track user behaviour on the website.
test_cookie15 minutesThe test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE5 months 27 daysA cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSCsessionYSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devicesneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt-remote-device-idneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt.innertube::nextIdneverThis cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
yt.innertube::requestsneverThis cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
__gpi1 year 24 daysGoogle Ads Service uses this cookie to collect information about from multiple websites for retargeting ads. For details of this cookie, go to Google's Privacy & Terms site
__qcaneverThe __qca cookie is associated with Quantcast. This anonymous data helps us to better understand users' needs and customize the website accordingly.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
DEVICE_INFO5 months 27 daysNo description
dp12 yearsNo description available.
nonsession2 yearsNo description available.
rtid14 years 10 months 2 days 1 hourDescription unavailable.
ssessionNo description
slimstat_tracking_code1 monthNo description available.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo