Ofcom Amateur Radio Licence Review

Welcome to the RSGB ConventionThis weekend was the annual RSGB Convention in Milton Keynes. For a summary of the event, see our RSGB Convention 2013 Report.

One of the highlights of the weekends agenda was a talk by two Ofcom representatives discussing the upcoming Amateur Radio Licence Review. As some of the changes being discussed are quite interesting, here’s a quick summary of the highlights:

The Outline

The overview into the upcoming public review was presented by Paul Jarvis and Ash Gohil from Ofcom. This was a pre-briefing ahead of a wider public consultation, so nothing set in stone – it was just an outline of what’s being considered. The consultation is expected to start in early 2014. Nonetheless, the audience response showed that there are some quite contentious issues, and it’s important for all amateurs to have their say once the consultation gets started.

Ofcom's Ash Gohil and Paul Jarvis G8RMM
Ofcom’s Ash Gohil and Paul Jarvis G8RMM (Pic: Trevor M5AKA)

Here’s a summary of the issues likely to be in the consultation:

Tidying the database

There are over 81,000 UK amateur licences allocated, but there are significantly less amateurs – A one-licence-per-amateur structure would simplify this.

Under discussion could be the revocation of a callsign once you have progressed to a higher level, or the us of a single licence / callsign that’s updated as you progress – possibly with an identifier at the end of a callsign to show Foundation, Intermediate or Full. Should any changes only apply to new licensees, or should existing amateurs also be affected by any proposed changes?

One Callsign Per Ham  - Ofcom Consultation Slides
One Callsign Per Ham – Ofcom Consultation Slides

Progression

How can we encourage people to progress from Foundation? It seems that it was always intended that Foundation would be the first step in an amateur’s journey, but many have stuck with M3 or M6 without progressing to Intermediate. Although not directly stated, it seems that it’s viewed that the higher the progression level, the better the amateur, and a way needs to be found to encourage amateurs to climb. Clearly that’s not going to work for everyone, but some thought is being given to either the stick or the carrot approach to the licence levels. One proposal was that the Foundation licence time out, which is clearly going to be controversial.

UPDATE: (Sept 2014): No changes re. Foundation licence progression were proposed in the final Ofcom consultation – There are no proposals to force amateurs to progress from Foundation.

Secondary Identifiers

One of the more lively discussion topics. The current understanding by most amateurs is that an English operator traveling to a Scottish location would mean a change of callsign – from M0PSX to MM0PSX – However it seems that’s no how Ofcom’s legal people see it – and it’s the main station operating address that determines the secondary locator. The cry from the audience was clear – the prefix determines where you’re operating from. Up for discussion in the consultation then, is whether the licence wording needs to change to reflect established operating practices, or whether amateurs need to fall in line with Ofcom’s interpretation of the current licence!

Ofcom Consultation Slides
Secondary Identifiers – Ofcom Consultation Slides

Club and Special Event Licences

Another interesting one. A club licence is in effect a personal licence for use with a club. Should that person leave the club, then the licence is still theirs, and not the club’s. A written letter of surrender seems to be required, so that a new officer of the club can take over the club’s callsign. Another option for consideration would be find a way to make the club, or a position within the club be the entity that owns the licence, but remember that a Full licence holder needs to hold a club licence.

Similarly, a special event licence is a variation on a person’s Full licence, meaning that that person needs to be present and supervising throughout the special event. Should this be opened to being a club special event licence, and if so, what is the impact? Again – interesting points for discussion.

Club Licences - Ofcom Consultation Slides
Club Licences – Ofcom Consultation Slides

Other changes

A number of other issues were discussed, such as:

  • Tidying up the definition for Maritime Mobile, to end confusion
  • Airborne use (for controlling high altitude balloons)
  • How to expire Repeater NoVs, where the repeater is not operating, tying up the allocation that could be used by others
  • Rules around operating whilst waiting for a licence to be issued.

Additionally, it was noted that there’s currently no provision to re-validate a club licence every 5 years online.

Next steps

Nothing firm has been decided, and nothing can be changed without the public consultation, but it’s going to be helpful for all amateurs to start thinking about these issues now, and having our voices heard when the consultation starts early next year.

If you care about all or any of these issues, here’s what to do:

  • Sign up to get updates on this from Ofcom: Amateur Radio Consultations
    Discuss the proposals in the RSGB’s online forum: RSGB Litmus Test

You’re also welcome to have your say here – in the comments section below…

UPDATE: The proposed changes to the licence were published in September 2014, with a public consultation running to the end of October 2014. See: Proposed Licence Changes (Sept 2104)

(PS: Sorry about the lack of decent photos – I was not at a great angle for pics. If you took a better shot, please forward it!)

Related content:

123 Comments

  1. Peter Carnegie 15 October 2013 Reply
  2. John davies 17 October 2013 Reply
    • Denis Speirs 5 July 2015 Reply
      • Steve 5 July 2015 Reply
        • M0CLZ 6 July 2015 Reply
          • Pete M0PSX Pete M0PSX 6 July 2015
        • Pete M0PSX Pete M0PSX 6 July 2015 Reply
      • Pete M0PSX Pete M0PSX 6 July 2015 Reply
    • john 22 November 2015 Reply
  3. David 1 November 2013 Reply
  4. David G3ZPF 1 November 2013 Reply
  5. Steve 1 November 2013 Reply
  6. John davies 3 November 2013 Reply
  7. Robert 5 November 2013 Reply
  8. Steve 14 November 2013 Reply
    • John davies 14 November 2013 Reply
  9. Steve 14 November 2013 Reply
  10. Steve 14 November 2013 Reply
  11. mike 14 December 2013 Reply
  12. kenjones 16 December 2013 Reply
  13. malcolm 24 December 2013 Reply
  14. shaun 11 January 2014 Reply
  15. Steve 12 January 2014 Reply
  16. aron M3ZZN 2 February 2014 Reply
  17. aron M3ZZN 2 February 2014 Reply
  18. John Brown 8 February 2014 Reply
  19. Bob 22 March 2014 Reply
  20. robert 24 March 2014 Reply
  21. M0GVZ 25 March 2014 Reply
  22. M0GVZ 25 March 2014 Reply
  23. doltare 16 June 2014 Reply
    • Grumbleton Oldfart 17 June 2014 Reply
  24. Steve 16 June 2014 Reply
    • doltare 16 June 2014 Reply
  25. Steve 16 June 2014 Reply
  26. Tony Topping 18 June 2014 Reply
  27. paul 21 June 2014 Reply
  28. Paul 22 June 2014 Reply
    • Pete M0PSX Pete M0PSX 22 June 2014 Reply
  29. M6WRO jon 22 June 2014 Reply
    • paul 6 July 2014 Reply
  30. Pete M 26 June 2014 Reply
  31. dave k 27 June 2014 Reply
  32. Steve 28 June 2014 Reply
  33. Jason 29 June 2014 Reply
    • paul 5 July 2014 Reply
  34. Pete 5 July 2014 Reply
  35. paul 5 July 2014 Reply
  36. Pete 5 July 2014 Reply
    • paul 6 July 2014 Reply
  37. M0CLZ 5 July 2014 Reply
  38. Pete 6 July 2014 Reply
  39. paul 6 July 2014 Reply
  40. Pete 6 July 2014 Reply
  41. paul 6 July 2014 Reply
  42. Pete 6 July 2014 Reply
    • paul 8 July 2014 Reply
      • Pete 8 July 2014 Reply
        • paul 8 July 2014 Reply
          • Pete 8 July 2014
        • paul 8 July 2014 Reply
          • Pete 8 July 2014
        • paul 8 July 2014 Reply
          • Pete 8 July 2014
  43. M0CLZ 6 July 2014 Reply
    • paul 8 July 2014 Reply
      • M0CLZ 8 July 2014 Reply
        • paul 8 July 2014 Reply
          • Pete 8 July 2014
          • M0CLZ 22 September 2014
  44. M0PZT 6 July 2014 Reply
    • paul 8 July 2014 Reply
  45. aron m3zzn 8 July 2014 Reply
    • M0CLZ 9 July 2014 Reply
  46. Steve 21 August 2014 Reply
  47. pete smith 7 September 2014 Reply
  48. Steve Tayler 11 September 2014 Reply
  49. Ronald 20 September 2014 Reply
  50. Nick 22 September 2014 Reply
  51. Nick 22 September 2014 Reply
    • M0CLZ 25 September 2014 Reply
  52. Dave 26 November 2014 Reply
  53. Pete M0PSX Pete M0PSX 26 November 2014 Reply
  54. Steve 15 December 2014 Reply
  55. gareth 6 January 2015 Reply
  56. Ste 6 January 2015 Reply
  57. Tony Lees 2 February 2015 Reply
  58. Tony Lees 2 February 2015 Reply
  59. Tony Lees 2 February 2015 Reply
  60. Ste 2 February 2015 Reply
  61. Pete 2 February 2015 Reply
  62. Pete 2 February 2015 Reply
  63. Ste 2 February 2015 Reply
  64. Ste 2 February 2015 Reply
  65. M0CLZ 2 February 2015 Reply
  66. Nick 3 February 2015 Reply
  67. Steve 3 February 2015 Reply
  68. Ste 3 February 2015 Reply
  69. dave 3 February 2015 Reply
  70. M0CLZ 3 February 2015 Reply
  71. Pete 3 February 2015 Reply
  72. Nick 3 February 2015 Reply
  73. Pete 3 February 2015 Reply
  74. Chris 15 February 2015 Reply
  75. dave 16 February 2015 Reply
  76. Pete 16 February 2015 Reply
  77. M5AKA 28 March 2015 Reply
  78. M5AKA 28 March 2015 Reply
  79. SWL Southeast 12 June 2015 Reply
  80. dave 13 June 2015 Reply
    • M0CLZ 13 June 2015 Reply
      • dave 13 June 2015 Reply
        • SWL Southeast 13 June 2015 Reply
  81. Steve 13 June 2015 Reply
  82. dave 13 June 2015 Reply
  83. SWL Southeast 13 June 2015 Reply
  84. M6KVT 14 October 2015 Reply
  85. Dougie 3 January 2016 Reply
    • Pete M0PSX Pete M0PSX 3 January 2016 Reply
  86. Steve 3 January 2016 Reply
  87. Dingo 12 March 2016 Reply
  88. Ronald Hampson 19 April 2016 Reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *